Genetic Evidence Reveals Ancient Human Migration to Australia
Full Transcript
A new DNA study has provided significant insights into the migration of the first humans to Australia, suggesting they arrived approximately 60,000 years ago, which is much earlier than previous genetic evidence indicated.
According to research published in Science Advances, this study analyzed 2,456 samples of mitochondrial DNA from Indigenous people of Australia and New Guinea. The findings indicate that the first Australians traveled to the ancient landmass known as Sahul via two distinct routes: one from the Philippines and Sulawesi, and another minor route from the south.
This genetic evidence aligns closely with archaeological data that places the arrival of humans in Australia at about 65,000 years ago, effectively bridging a longstanding gap between genetic and archaeological timelines.
Christopher Clarkson, an archaeologist at Griffith University, noted that the timing of the first human arrival has sparked ongoing debate in the fields of genetics and archaeology. Previously, genetic research suggested a timeframe of 47,000 to 51,000 years ago for the arrival of modern humans.
The new study’s results support what is known as the 'long chronology' for settlement, countering the 'short chronology' that many past genetic studies have favored. Martin Richards, an archaeogeneticist and one of the study's authors, explained that the methodology was refined to account for the varying rates of mitochondrial DNA mutations.
This correction provided a clearer timeline, suggesting that these early humans were capable of seafaring, evidenced by their ability to navigate open waters, which would be necessary for reaching Sahul.
Helen Farr, an archaeologist at the University of Southampton, emphasized that this migration was not accidental, as people were making intentional crossings as early as 60,000 years ago. The debate over the correct timeline is still ongoing, with some experts like Bastien Llamas from the University of Adelaide cautioning that the discrepancies in molecular clock calculations indicate that further research is required to solidify the genetic timeline.
Despite this, the new study is viewed as a significant consolidation of evidence linking genetics and archaeology, providing a deeper understanding of the migration patterns of ancient peoples. The researchers continue to analyze hundreds of whole human genome sequences to expand on these findings, and hope that future archaeological discoveries will further clarify this complex history.
As the scientific community moves forward, both geneticists and archaeologists acknowledge that this new evidence sheds light on the deep heritage of Indigenous communities in Australia, reinforcing their connection to the land for tens of thousands of years.